Last night I was listening to Dana Loesch and, while I don’t yet fully embrace her style, the content of what she says is usually spot on.
She was on a tear last night about the events in Ferguson, MO. She’s from St. Louis, of which Ferguson is a suburb, so she has more than simply a passing interest in the goings on there.
She pointed out that in the recent election, in the greater St. Louis area, the polls had a 40% voter turn out. So, people are supposedly angry enough to have a racially motivated protest (which many fear will turn into a violent riot), but they’re not angry enough to actually vote!
She informed the audience that the politicians in that area are a corrupt old boys network, and have been for quite some time. If the people don’t like how things are, why didn’t they go out and vote them out of office? But, no, while the people were out protesting these same politicians were re-elected back into office.
Now, I’ve always maintained that it is the right of Americans to revolt and overthrow the government if it becomes necessary (having the right and being able to carry it out are two entirely different things, obviously). Dana’s rant made me re-evaluate my position on that, however. I haven’t changed my basic position, but I have decided that, apparently, I need to add a qualifier for those who take too simplistic a view of it. And yes, I know there are differences between a protest, a riot, and a revolt, but one can certainly lead to the next.
It should be abundantly obvious, but it seems that may not be the case. We the people should not even consider revolting if we can’t even be bothered to go out and vote. I’ll stop short of saying we shouldn’t be allowed to revolt, but in good conscience, we should not. We have a process in place that, if we all participate, should work.
A revolution should be reserved for when and if the system doesn’t work. If, say, 75% or 80% of the people vote and their wishes are not carried out, then, perhaps, a revolution is in order. But when a majority of the voters refuse to take part in the process, then it seems disingenuous at best to incite even a possibility of violence. At worst it’s reckless and unpatriotic.